From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 22:46:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C4D16A4CE; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:46:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E0443D2D; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:46:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from craig@tobuj.gank.org) Received: by ion.gank.org (mail, from userid 1001) id 8F54C2AF51; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:46:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:46:04 -0600 From: Craig Boston To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20050329224603.GD86797@nowhere> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston , "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <319cceca0503281001792baf39@mail.gmail.com> <1112135353.749.84.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112135353.749.84.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: organization X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:46:08 -0000 At the risk of going further and further off-topic from freebsd-hackers... On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:29:13PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > Sounds like a bad situation there. On our server we use svn+ssh, except > for a few Windows clients that use https. (BTW our server is running > 4-STABLE and it's wonderful.) Hmmm, I initially didn't want to use that because I read that it suffers from the same security issues as CVS. The appeal of being able to fine-tune permissions and grant subversion access without shell access is quite luring. HTTP timeouts during long operations, on the other hand, suck. ( my server is woefully underpowered :-D ). Note to davsvn users with slow servers: http-timeout = 3600 is your friend. > Heh. :-) 1.1.3 is current now, but one can find mentions of a 1.1.4 > bugfix release being planned, as well as the (farther out) 1.2 release > with locking. Oh, I've been running 1.1.3 on both client and server since it went into ports (many dump/loads later). Just haven't taken the time to see what's new and compare to older versions. :) Craig