From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 6 9:10:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from vip.consys.com (VIP.ConSys.COM [209.141.107.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB7A155FF for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: (from pinyon@localhost) by vip.consys.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA38882; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:09:46 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:09:46 -0700 (MST) From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-Id: <199908061609.JAA38882@vip.consys.com> To: crossd@cs.rpi.edu, dot@dotat.at Subject: Re: SMP and threads... Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG |"David E. Cross" wrote: |>I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor. |>I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a |>solution, I think it involved a patch. |> |>Any pointers? | |http://lt.tar.com And don't be turned off by the "outdated" tunnel Richard stuck up there, delete the two references to deferred signals in the libc_r code that gets copied over into the port. Then you get a thread implementation that still works better than libc_r for things like TAO. (Although I haven't had a chance to rerun the tests with the libc_r changes this week). Russell | |Tony. |-- |f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net e pluribus unix | | |To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org |with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message