From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 4 15:26:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31001065677 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A7F8FC15 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 21820 invoked by uid 399); 4 Aug 2009 15:26:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 4 Aug 2009 15:26:14 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A785310.6070109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:26:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Diego Depaoli References: <20090706014719.GG11993@lonesome.com> <070151759cb2aacd36a14eb4b318a435@xs4all.nl> <20090716181711.GC90253@comcast.net> <36957fedc04d840595162bb026a8ec62@xs4all.nl> <20090801114833.GA23826@lonesome.com> <83e5fb980908040459k2e533ab4o2d23b229f98b8ace@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <83e5fb980908040459k2e533ab4o2d23b229f98b8ace@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Linimon , Martin Tournoij , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:26:20 -0000 Diego Depaoli wrote: > There are too many ports and too few people who care them. > IMHO the options are: > - decrease the number of ports We trim dead/useless ports all the time. > - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers... This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD. > - switch to a multi-level solution (e.g. Archlinux). In DiegoBSD you should feel free to use any solution you think is useful. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection