From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Feb 13 15:14:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.57.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520C837B400; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from h214.229.dialup.iptcom.net ([212.9.229.214]) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #1) id 16b8bn-000DPh-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 02:14:40 +0300 Subject: Re: Xscreensaver and GNOME From: Maxim Sobolev To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: Jeremy Lea , Doug Barton , Ade Lovett , gnome@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020213172853.S65221-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20020213172853.S65221-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cjVEStOp67j9ymfvG6up" Message-Id: <1013641756.24926.1.camel@notebook> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 14 Feb 2002 01:14:27 +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-cjVEStOp67j9ymfvG6up Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 00:31, Joe Clarke wrote:=20 >=20 >=20 > On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Jeremy Lea wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:24:04PM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote: > > > In this case, shouldn't we exclude WANT_GNOME from xscreensaver's > > > Makefile, and just have this in the slave port? > > > > No, because that's the entire point of the WANT_* magic. If a user has > > the bits the port wants, then they get supported, if they don't then > > they just get a vanilla port, without all the bloat. > > > > Joe, you've been doing a lot of good patches to Gnome ports. You shoul= d > > read bsd.port.mk and bsd.gnome.mk and try to understand them. You'll > > find that it makes fixing ports a lot simpler. If you stumble on > > anything, email me. I've got a pretty good understanding of them both, > > and I'll try (as best I can) to explain what the code is doing and why. >=20 > I have looked through them, and I understand the WANT_/HAVE_ thing. > I thought Doug wanted to leave GNOME out of the main port, and just have > the slave port activate it. Either way, the WANT_GNOME won't activate th= e > GNOME bits unless GNOME is installed, so I guess that's fine. Sorry for > the confusion. Absolutely correct, WANT_GNOME ensures that GNOME only be activated if either WITH_GNOME is specified in the /etc/make.conf or gnome bits are already installed on the user's box. -Maxim=20 --=-cjVEStOp67j9ymfvG6up Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8avIcoNu5t4iCBa8RAkgIAJ0TQfeo3O5w/qgZv8YOzKwko6tyxQCePsnG T8IvDUjd7GIL6hB+xdvIBuc= =WKK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cjVEStOp67j9ymfvG6up-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message