From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 23 12:23: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from dt052n3e.san.rr.com (dt052n3e.san.rr.com [204.210.33.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DDB37B56D for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 12:23:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from yahoo-inc.com (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt052n3e.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA39715; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@yahoo-inc.com) Message-ID: <397B4612.901888DF@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 12:22:58 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantifying entropy References: <12075.964301487@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > Me too! This is completely unproductive. I'm getting close to the > > point of putting "entropy" and "random" into my kill file. > > The only way I can see this discussion being useful is if we come up > with some way to subscribe one's /dev/random to one of our mailing > lists. That would be a fine source of entropy, would it not? :-) Only if my /dev/random killfile'ed Brett first. His input stream is too predictable. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message