Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:23:31 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: wilko@freebsd.org, "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-20000719-RC#2 Message-ID: <20000722002331.B22611@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007211456370.8451-100000@semuta.feral.com>; from mjacob@feral.com on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 02:57:23PM -0700 References: <20000721234759.C21976@freebie.demon.nl> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007211456370.8451-100000@semuta.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > Mike and I had hoped to use the 4100 to debug this problem. > > > But it isn't usable yet. > > The 4100 is perfectly usable. The issues are entirely in the installer and/or > the boot blocks. Yes, that is what I wrote and experienced myself. > > 4100 makes a good release builder once installed via another machine.. > > TurboLaser, even with a slower CPU, actually makes a better one. And a noisier one ;-) But I'd go for the ES40. -- Wilko Bulte http://www.freebsd.org wilko@freebsd.org http://www.nlfug.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000722002331.B22611>