From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:47:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C82516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C4ED43D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 11332 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 12:44:12 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 12:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 48411 invoked by uid 555); 28 Jun 2004 13:47:06 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.188) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088430425-48343 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 17:47:05 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED741395; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:46:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:46:39 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Iain Dooley Message-ID: <20040628134639.GA5699@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Iain Dooley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: /Ariya/Day_jaru cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:14 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 06:05:40AM +0500, Iain Dooley probably wrote: > thanks all for your suggestions. i'll refrain from running the portupgrad= e=20 > on KDE whilst KDE is running. >=20 > as for the patch procedures you guys suggested, i'm actually looking for = a=20 > way to do it without using the ports system at all. the problem is that= =20 > kdebase takes so long to build, and as we have already discussed i can't= =20 > run it whilst running KDE, and it's a rare occassion that i can afford to= =20 > be without my PC for that long, and there is no individual port for Kate. Just a minute. You shouldn't portupgrade KDE when KDE is running, but you should be able to run `make' to build everything while KDE is running, shut down KDE and `portupgrade -w' afterwards (which will use the binaries built by `make' and install them, taking seriously less time than the original `make') and restart KDE. At least that's how it would with an ordinary port. So if your only problem is that you can't use the thing without KDE, then this approach should solve the problem (use nice(1) to change the make's priority so that the box is really usable). > the patch i've received is about 10 lines of code and the problem that it= =20 > solves is _extremely_ minor, so if there is no way to rebuild Kate withou= t=20 > rebuilding all of KDEBase, then i probably won't bother :-) >=20 HTH anyway, --=20 DoubleF If you want to know what god thinks of money, just look at the people he gave it to. -- Dorothy Parker --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4CE9wo7hT/9lVdwRAnszAJ4jdSCKYv23Q4myy3IJ4iiWYcce7QCeKHFw FHmr1XuLVVHv5VcUCJve6gk= =8cEK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--