From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 17 09:54:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA22750 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from numachi.numachi.com (numachi.numachi.com [198.175.254.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA22742 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from reichert@localhost) by numachi.numachi.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA22333; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 12:53:56 -0400 Message-ID: <19970617125354.13758@numachi.numachi.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 12:53:54 -0400 From: Brian Reichert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnuplot v 3.0 References: <199706171539.KAA12155@news.cioe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.68 In-Reply-To: <199706171539.KAA12155@news.cioe.com>; from Steven Ames on Tue, Jun 17, 1997 at 10:39:08AM -0500 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Anyhow, I see there is no longer a port of gnuplot for 2.1.7, 2.2.x, or > current. I looked through the -questions archive, and I found one useful > post with some diffs that wouldn't apply properly to gnuplot 3.0. Has > anyone compiled gnuplot successfully? I just grabbed gnuplot-3.5.tar.gz and was able to build it under 2.2.1R without much fuss. I had to poke it in the eye a couple of times, but I could get away with 'make x11' when all was said and done... -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert reichert@numachi.com 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path