From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  6 17:26:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF0116A4CE
	for <FreeBSD-Questions@Freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2004 17:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parts-unknown.org (dsl093-170-248.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[66.93.170.248])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0765443D2D
	for <FreeBSD-Questions@Freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2004 17:26:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org)
Received: (qmail 4586 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2004 01:26:06 -0000
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:26:06 -0800
From: David Benfell <benfell@greybeard95a.com>
To: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@mcmanis.com>
Message-ID: <20040307012606.GA2788@parts-unknown.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@mcmanis.com>,
	"Raymond Wiegand" <rgmcsierra2000@msn.com>,
	FreeBSD-Questions@Freebsd.org
References: <BAY4-F11FZ1HCONkTJD00019a5d@hotmail.com>
	<6.0.0.22.2.20040306153313.02786e48@66.125.189.29>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20040306153313.02786e48@66.125.189.29>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-stardate: [-29]1770.27
cc: Raymond Wiegand <rgmcsierra2000@msn.com>
cc: FreeBSD-Questions@Freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBsd and SCO
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:26:07 -0000

On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:34:52 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote:
> Unlike the GPL, the BSD license has already been litigated (see AT&T vs The 
> Regents), there is quite a bit of clarity around the legality of the BSD 
> source.
> 
Indeed it has.  But SCO doesn't stand a chance with its suit against
Linux either.  So the impossibility of success is clearly not a
deterrent.

-- 
David Benfell, LCP
benfell@parts-unknown.org
---
Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html