From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 10 23:51:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997E916A4F1 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:51:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEC043D1F for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3ANpnIq017485; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:51:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: "Jay O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <4259B932.1010005@att.net> References: <0IEH00KMJ6U14XA0@store.etat.lu> <1112729834.68302.2.camel@genius2.i.cz> <4258D61C.90301@att.net> <1113127599.8293.116.camel@genius2.i.cz> <42594C93.5070203@att.net> <1113149943.630.37.camel@genius2.i.cz> <4259A6E9.2090104@att.net> <1113173019.630.45.camel@genius2.i.cz> <4259B932.1010005@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:51:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1113177108.630.56.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:51:55 -0000 Jay O'Brien wrote: > Michal Mertl wrote: > > > > You haven't read the thread in the archives carefully enough, have you? > > Yes, but unfortunately I didn't comprehend. > > > Here is what I wrote (privately to the original poster but I explained > > the error to the mailing list too): > > > > > >>What? I don't know how the patching of vidcontrol ended but you'd > >>better redo it with fresh files from current. Go download vidcontrol.c > >>v 1.48 and vidcontrol.1 from > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol/ > >> > >>Then run the patch on it again and recompile/reinstall vidcontrol > >>binary. > > > > I did that. The files are vidcontrol.1 Rev 1.55 and Vidcontrol.c Rev 1.48. > Now all hunks failed. The results are below. I don't know. The text before the line starting with "Patching" is taken from the patch file. The patch program doesn't retrieve any files. So I think you either used bad files to patch or bad patchfile. You need to have the original files. To check they're correct you can use md5 utility. md5 vidcontrol.c MD5 (vidcontrol.c) = 1068e5a6aff863e2bc7a0c02098d43b1 md5 vidcontrol.1 MD5 (vidcontrol.1) = 080d2b84f2e3914090279fee6e5f2406 md5 vidcontrol.diff.20050215 MD5 (vidcontrol.diff.20050215) = 67ae12fe2a4fecae1bb7adb141efe021 You need to see the same strings. Then command 'patch < /path/to/vidcontro.diff.20050215' must work. Michal