From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  7 16:10:10 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC87816A420
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Mar 2006 16:10:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B07443D64
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Mar 2006 16:10:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k27GA8MN021759
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:10:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:10:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0603071005010.6977-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0603071109210.7181-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: usr.bin/rpcinfo hack
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:10:10 -0000

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> Does anyone know why usr.bin/rpcinfo/ needs to include/build with libc
> sources (libc/rpc/rpc_generic.c)?  The functions that rpcinfo uses are
> exported from libc and are defined in /usr/include/.

usr.sbin/rpcbind has the same (seemingly) unneeded hack.

-- 
DE