From owner-svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Wed Oct 24 16:18:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-branches@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E829FFB1E8; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188DA6C081; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 05A6B6D3E; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:18:32 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Guido Falsi Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r482744 - in branches/2018Q4/security/pam_ssh_agent_auth: . files Message-ID: <20181024161832.GA32360@FreeBSD.org> References: <201810221246.w9MCkPDY056948@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201810221246.w9MCkPDY056948@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the branches of the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:18:33 -0000 On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:46:25PM +0000, Guido Falsi wrote: > New Revision: 482744 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/482744 > > Log: > MFH: r482655 > > - Fix build with OpenSSL 1.1.1 > ... > ++#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L I was under impression that correct check is against 0x10100005L (since opaque structs and other API changes were introduced with 1.1.0-pre5), is it so? ./danfe