From owner-freebsd-isdn  Thu Sep  7  5:12:32 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.bsag.ch (ns.bsag.ch [195.246.88.210])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B6537B422
	for <freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  7 Sep 2000 05:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from hpr@localhost)
	by ns.bsag.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id OAA32586
	for freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:12:26 +0200
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:12:26 +0200
From: Hanspeter Roth Bsag <roth@bsag.ch>
To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: configuring Ppp
Message-ID: <20000907141226.A32313@bs11.bsag.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hello,

I'm trying to setup PPP over ISDN.
So far I've tried userland PPP.
I think ppp and isdnd should work together if ppp.conf has
`set device /dev/i4brbch0 /dev/i4brbch1' and isdnd.rc has
`usrdevicename = rbch' and `usrdeviceunit = 0'.
But I ppp won't dial because he gets no carrier.
(Isdnd reports incoming calls that are destined for the Cisco
which is on the same S-bus.)

Do I have to decide which PPP (synchronous or userland) I use
already before building the kernel?
If I enable both pseudo-device sppp and pseudo-device ppp
will there be a runtime conflict?

Is synchronous or userland PPP just a matter of implementation
or is it also reflected to the remote ISDN device?

-Hanspeter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message