Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:13:01 +0100
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
To:        Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 coretemp.4 src/sys/dev/coretemp coretemp.c
Message-ID:  <C8F0AA13-554D-4529-AA50-E0EEC6CFF937@fnop.net>
In-Reply-To: <47126474.9010108@root.org>
References:  <20071014105947.D096C16A57E@hub.freebsd.org> <47126474.9010108@root.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 14 Oct 2007, at 19:48, Nate Lawson wrote:

> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> netchild    2007-10-14 10:59:44 UTC
>>
>>   FreeBSD src repository
>>
>>   Modified files:
>>     share/man/man4       coretemp.4
>>     sys/dev/coretemp     coretemp.c
>>   Log:
>>   Convert coretemp(4) to the hardware sensors framework and
>>   make sure to never call sched_bind() for uninitialised CPUs.
>>
>>   Submitted by:   Constantine A. Murenin <cnst@FreeBSD.org>
>>   Sponsored by:   Google Summer of Code 2007 (GSoC2007/cnst-sensors)
>>   Mentored by:    syrinx
>>   Tested by:      many
>>   OKed by:        kensmith
>>
>>   Revision  Changes    Path
>>   1.2       +14 -6     src/share/man/man4/coretemp.4
>>   1.3       +46 -35    src/sys/dev/coretemp/coretemp.c
>
>> -	thread_lock(curthread);
>> -	sched_unbind(curthread);
>> -	thread_unlock(curthread);
>> +	 * Bind to specific CPU to read the correct temperature.
>> +	 * If not all CPUs are initialised, then only read from
>> +	 * cpu0, returning -1 on all other CPUs.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (smp_cpus > 1) {
>> +		thread_lock(curthread);
>> +		sched_bind(curthread, cpu);
>> +		msr = rdmsr(MSR_THERM_STATUS);
>> +		sched_unbind(curthread);
>> +		thread_unlock(curthread);
>> +	} else if (cpu != 0)
>> +		return (-1);
>> +	else
>> +		msr = rdmsr(MSR_THERM_STATUS);
>
> I reviewed this part of the patch for Rui Paulo and told him to use
> smp_active instead of smp_cpus > 1.

Sorry, for not getting back to you sooner, but there's a better way  
than that. I briefly chatted with jhb and the proper way is to use  
SYSINIT(9). This way the module works on UP and SMP machines.
I have a patch, but my devel machine has panic()ed.

Regards.
--
Rui Paulo




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C8F0AA13-554D-4529-AA50-E0EEC6CFF937>