From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 22:03:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CAE16A468 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outP.internet-mail-service.net (outP.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F0B13C442 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:03:52 -0800 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E49126CCE; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:03:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4761AC47.2010904@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:03:51 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> <200712130021.56473.max@love2party.net> <476072DB.3090600@elischer.org> <200712131549.21669.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <476190F2.2030105@elischer.org> <47619502.5070404@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47619502.5070404@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Nikos Vassiliadis , Max Laier Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:03:53 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > How about "setfib"? > > I strongly believe we should deprecate the use of the term "routing" > where the BSD forwarding plane is concerned, whilst familiar to many it > is misleading as to what that part of the system is actually doing. maybe, but it would be a large surprise to everyone who expects that structure be be called the routing table as it still is in most systems. In OpenBSD they have decided to call the in-kernel decriptor 'id' but I'd rather go with tableid or maybe tbl_num, because 'id' is too generic. 'tid' is already thread id. > > 2c > BMS