Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:12:25 -0500 From: PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: flash alternative Message-ID: <4B1E6CD9.30402@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca> References: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
PJ wrote: > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean. > Anyone know anything about this? > TIA > PJ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > Could F3 be the alternative/replacement? http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/f3:_a_replacement_for_flash%3F http://blogs.sun.com/chrisoliver/ I'd like to hear some opinions on this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B1E6CD9.30402>