From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 29 14: 0:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD26014F94 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:00:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id OAA64811; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:00:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:00:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903292200.OAA64811@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tom Hukins Subject: Re: ports/10857: NEW PORT: bind-8.2 Reply-To: Tom Hukins Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/10857; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Hukins To: bradh@uunet.co.za Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/10857: NEW PORT: bind-8.2 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:40:25 +0100 On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 02:52:44PM +0200, bradh@uunet.co.za wrote: > > >Synopsis: NEW PORT: bind-8.2 There is already a bind8 port in /usr/ports/net. It would probably be better if you sent a patch to upgrade the existing port rather than submitting a new port. See the Handbook for details on how to upgrade a port. Is there a good reason for having two bind8 ports? Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message