From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 27 23:15:35 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD35106566C;
	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99241611C9;
	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:14:55 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FEB93EF.8040709@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:14:55 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
References: <201206242320.q5ONK5Gf001469@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20120624234248.GA33644@DataIX.net>
	<20120627223608.GD243@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120627223608.GD243@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conf/169373: mountd starts to early when exporting fs marked
 as late
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:15:35 -0000

On 06/27/2012 03:36 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I'd argue that in an NFSv4 or CIFS/SMB world it's inappropriate to
> export file systems until after LOGIN.  Fixing that would render this
> issue moot.  The reason is that mounts for either of those systems may
> require working kerberos and directory services.

Yeah, I think that Rick mentioned that at some point as well. I'm
certainly not opposed to moving it there.