Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:42:53 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Syscall number. Message-ID: <3E04B62D.642DE2B6@mindspring.com> References: <20021220184337.GD11475@garage.freebsd.pl> <20021221032233.GG11475@garage.freebsd.pl> <3E04A8D2.C6CDBF6A@mindspring.com> <20021221175226.GP11475@garage.freebsd.pl> <3E04B3A6.A820638A@mindspring.com> <20021221183703.GQ11475@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > But I may catch even _all_ system call, so making separate functions > for every syscall isn't good idea (if I understand You well). The place to deal with that is to replace the exec loader so you can manage the trap code yourself, instead of replacing system call entry points. Execution class loaders can also be loadable modules (e.g. IBCS2, Linux, etc.). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E04B62D.642DE2B6>