Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:43:27 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports system woes Message-ID: <fsdnef$j3j$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080326135806.M17639@FreeBSD.org> References: <20080326131800.GA75243@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20080326135806.M17639@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig73FF18692143097579228E75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Solution is to use tools that are available in our base system. SQLite = is not. Yet :) Compared to some of the (huge) things that are maintained in the base, maintaining sqlite would be trivial :) But it's not as if the question is "sqlite or bust" - as OP noted, restructuring the system a bit and using better algorithms could fix many problems. The thing is - using something like sqlite is (at least for people used to SQL) much easier than rolling your own file system database (including locking and atomic ops). --------------enig73FF18692143097579228E75 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH6mEPldnAQVacBcgRAmL0AJ4zBHXQC6PwzbEYzgPzOOjJTKbY/gCgxuiF 1Np6GwlIOweSYJF7q/YLz/8= =M3++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig73FF18692143097579228E75--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fsdnef$j3j$1>