From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Oct 22 14:38:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA06325
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 14:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from scrappy@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA06307;
          Tue, 22 Oct 1996 14:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 14:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy>
Message-Id: <199610222137.OAA06307@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gjbroom@kinsella.csc.UVic.CA, scrappy, freebsd-bugs
Subject: Re: conf/972
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Synopsis: inetd.conf should comment out k-services if no Kerberos present

State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: scrappy
State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 22 14:36:01 PDT 1996
State-Changed-Why: 


Does anyone have an opinion on this one?

Basically, since Kerberos isn't distributed on the CD, Originator
suggests commenting out the appropriate entries in /etc/inetd.conf

Are there any reasons, security or otherwise, where leaving them 
enabled is a bad thing?