Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:37:22 -0600 (CST) From: Stephen Bader <steveb@jorsm.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: VTUN/Routed Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111101815000.8845-100000@mercury.jorsm.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10111101558090.49638-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm trying to create a network that is only physically connected via a tunnel across the internet. I'm using vtun for the tunnel, and both ends of the tunnel can ping the other end. The tunneling is working great. The setup looks like the diagram below: _________ __________ | | ppp0 10.0.0.1 ppp0 10.0.0.2 | | | TUN A | fxp0 123.456.123.456 fxp0 123.654.123.654| TUN B | | | ------------------ Internet ---------------- | | ---------- ----------- Tunnel box A is connected to a physical LAN in which many routers are talking RIPv2. I have routed running on both TUN A and TUN B. Routed on TUN A is talking RIPv2 with all of the other routers, and updating its routing table properly. However, it isn't telling TUN B about the routes its learning. I know that both TUN A and B are talking rip though, because if I add an alias to the ethernet interface on either box, the routing table on the other box updates appropriately. Is there something I need to do to make sure it broadcasts its known routes over the ppp0 interface? I've been running "routed -s" and made sure both machines are running as gateways. What would prevent TUN A from telling TUN B about routes that it has learned? Is there something I have over-looked? -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0111101815000.8845-100000>