From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Apr 18 21:22: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from proxy.OBK.ru (ovk.barrt.ru [194.84.233.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB88937B43E
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from subs@ovk.altai.ru)
Received: from localhost (subs@localhost)
	by proxy.OBK.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA35778
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:21:53 +0700 (NOVST)
	(envelope-from subs@ovk.altai.ru)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:21:53 +0700 (NOVST)
From: "Yuri A. Wolf" <subs@ovk.altai.ru>
X-Sender: subs@proxy.obk.ru
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: ntp-4.0.99k23?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191115090.22782-100000@proxy.obk.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hello

After I upgraded to ntp-4.0.99k_2 I noted that ntp port changed again to
ntp-4.0.99k23.

Is the 1st one vulnerable? Is the 2d one ok?

--
Yuri Wolf
wolf@ovk.altai.ru


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message