From owner-freebsd-net Sun Dec 6 13:45:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08469 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 13:45:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA08462 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 13:45:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA40885; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 13:44:53 -0800 (PST) To: alk@pobox.com cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: resolver behaviour In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 06 Dec 1998 14:59:05 CST." <13930.53261.509843.979179@avalon.east> Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 13:44:52 -0800 Message-ID: <40881.912980692@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I guess my only real question here is why Paul Vixie isn't being asked for this feature rather than us. Since we basically just track BIND from him and have every intention of continuing to do so, if it's a feature you can sell to him then it's a feature we're obviously going to adopt. If, on the other hand, you *can't* sell the feature to him then that would be a big doc fork for us at the very least and probably a showstopper for getting it into FreeBSD anyway. It's just too big a win to be able to say "Just go read the BIND docs and stop pestering me for tech support on 3rd party software." - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message