Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:08:53 +0100 From: Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net> To: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@neva.vlink.ru> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs Message-ID: <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> In-Reply-To: <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> References: <200503091838.06322.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, You (Denis Shaposhnikov) wrote: > >>>>> "Kris" == Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> writes: > > Kris> nullfs seems to work fine, unionfs is very fragile and easily > Kris> exploded. > > nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow. What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this? bye, Andy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050310160852.GB1718>