From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Mon Oct 2 18:49:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C94E2484B for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00466733F0 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v92InQse072312 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:49:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222692] Source install shows using svn, not svnlite Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:49:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bsd@haps.ca X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:49:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222692 --- Comment #2 from bsd@haps.ca --- Barring some active discussion with timeline to remove svnlite (which I'm unaware of), what you're suggesting is to leave the handbook in an inconsis= tent state. Recalling how long the cvs->svn move took, maybe holding our breath waiting for svnlite to go away isn't recommended. The handbook is really t= he one place new users are urged to read prior to any discussion on mailing li= sts, newsgroups, irc, etc. Granted there is an issue with base system documenta= tion that 194910 attempts to address. That bug was filed nearly 3 years ago. system. Referencing 191163: a patch to update svnlite documentation makes a lot of sense! Is there anything stopping that, or is it just on the giant 'nobody= 's submitted a patch for this yet' list? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=