From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Feb 11 17:18:14 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0671737B401
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C8B43FB1
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:18:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141])
	by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C5E818B429B; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:18:02 -0400 (AST)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:18:02 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@attbi.com>,
	Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>,
	Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>,
	Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bugzilla? (was Re: Okay, I think I need some serious introduction
  ;-)
In-Reply-To: <3E498592.5E5BF4EE@mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <20030211211426.A43952@hub.org>
References: <20030209185618.GA19962@papagena.rockefeller.edu> 
 <20030209151407.N548@localhost> <2e1y2e7jtu.y2e@localhost.localdomain>
 <3E498592.5E5BF4EE@mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-chat.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-chat>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-chat>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:

> "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > What needs to be done is various 'cut off points' need to somehow be
> > > established ... for instance, anything dealing pre-4.x should be closed
> > > ...
> >
> > How about putting "policies" in the PR Guidelines something like this:
>
> [ ... time-based, committer interest-based policies ... ]
>
> > The numbers might be too small.
>
> The problem with this approach is that it's possible to ignore
> a PR to make it go away, without the underlying problem being
> repaired/acknowledged.

And that is different then now, leaving it open?  How many PRs right now
contain patches that ppl have 'ignored' and, as a result, are no longer
even relevant to the code?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message