Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:18:02 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@attbi.com>, Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla? (was Re: Okay, I think I need some serious introduction ;-) Message-ID: <20030211211426.A43952@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <3E498592.5E5BF4EE@mindspring.com> References: <20030209185618.GA19962@papagena.rockefeller.edu> <20030209151407.N548@localhost> <2e1y2e7jtu.y2e@localhost.localdomain> <3E498592.5E5BF4EE@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > > What needs to be done is various 'cut off points' need to somehow be > > > established ... for instance, anything dealing pre-4.x should be closed > > > ... > > > > How about putting "policies" in the PR Guidelines something like this: > > [ ... time-based, committer interest-based policies ... ] > > > The numbers might be too small. > > The problem with this approach is that it's possible to ignore > a PR to make it go away, without the underlying problem being > repaired/acknowledged. And that is different then now, leaving it open? How many PRs right now contain patches that ppl have 'ignored' and, as a result, are no longer even relevant to the code? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030211211426.A43952>