From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 28 13:50:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA09854 for current-outgoing; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 13:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from sxt2.space.lockheed.com (sxt2.space.lockheed.com [192.68.162.109]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA09848 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 13:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by sxt2.space.lockheed.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA01044; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 13:44:55 -0800 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 13:44:54 -0800 (PST) From: "Brian N. Handy" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. In-Reply-To: <26399.828045200@time.cdrom.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The problem is simple: xf86config (and much of the rest of X) is still > looking for libc.so.2.2, among perhaps other things. We've still no > "2.1compat" distribution, so I decided to let this one ride as most > folks (I hope all!) getting the SNAP CD will know that some assembly > is required, and can either fetch the libraries from an older 2.1 > system or recompile those portions of XFree86 they wish to use. I saw this last night on a new install. I just did a soft link to...uh...I think libc.so.3.0 and it seemed to work just fine. I'm not completely sure it's just fine yet, but no problems so far. Brian