From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 27 22:01:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B977716A41F for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adampordzik@gmx.de) Received: from webmail.hansenet.de (mail02.hansenet.de [213.191.73.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F68443D60 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:01:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adampordzik@gmx.de) Received: from [10.12.0.41] (213.39.221.36) by webmail.hansenet.de (7.2.059) (authenticated as mbox-ap@d-dt.de) id 42EEDD43003325D4 for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:01:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4310E2B2.5030001@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:01:22 +0200 From: Adam Pordzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Packagename of openldap WITH_SASL (e.g) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:01:24 -0000 Hello, I think it is generally no good idea of an OpenLDAP port with altered "sasl" name. Here I have 8 ports/packages which depends of "openldap22-client", not "openldap22-sasl-client". The only is openldap22-server, which I've built with WITH_SASL So the package-names becomes "openldap22-server" and "openldap-sasl-client", and I had to add a proper line to +REQUIRED_BY by each new package added to the system. Same with apache+modssl and maybe other. There are so many ports now, that it would be much more concise NOT to create so many "sub-ports". A --