Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:20:44 -0800 (PST) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade O(n^m)? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0702151020440.16360@hymn07.u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <346a80220702150826k784f6538i8a76655c745b2b5a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote: > On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: >> >> Quoting Olivier Warin <daffy@xview.net> (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007 >> 19:54:09 +0100): >> >> > This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes >> > far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is >> > awfull too. >> >> Regarding "make index": try "make fetchindex" right after the cvsup. >> IT may not be up to the point with the cvsupped stuff, but not far off. >> >> Bye, >> Alexander. > > > > I don't think we who use the modular X.org tree can do this since a number > of the ports won't be properly registered in the file (or am I off-base > here?). > -- > Coleman Heh, that is a serious problem considering that modular Xorg would probably at max add about 100 ~ 150~some packages to the portage tree, depending on how things are done. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.43.0702151020440.16360>