From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 2 13: 5:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-131.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A1637B402 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 784CD66C76; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:04:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:04:46 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "J.S." Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a better way to gpg encrypt files? Message-ID: <20020202130446.A8721@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20020202104434.1beb501f.johann@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020202104434.1beb501f.johann@broadpark.no>; from johann@broadpark.no on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:44:34AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:44:34AM +0100, J.S. wrote: > there must be a more convenient way to keep frequently modified sensitive > files gpg encrypted, than what gpg allows so far? That depends on what you mean by 'better', i.e. what you think the problems with gpg are. Kris --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8XFRtWry0BWjoQKURAjY+AJ9VXn57xlWjVVpcNDEjNgEjEIzCrgCgys3X +Rk41Z/cMP4Y0NbrEqrBRXc= =vWFX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message