Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:31:05 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: =?UTF-8?B?Tmlrb2xhIExlxI1pxIc=?= <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net> Cc: "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" <wundram@beenic.net>, FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? Message-ID: <47B06A39.7090708@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <20080211161507.6e82fbd4@anthesphoria.net> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <47B05924.5000405@cs.okstate.edu> <47B05C7A.80602@pacific.net.sg> <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> <20080211161507.6e82fbd4@anthesphoria.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 >=20 > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:40:34 +0100 > "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net> wrote: > =20 >> This is another reason why Flash is bad, bad, bad. Am I repeating >> myself? this is known. I mean, it is known that Flash is bad. >=20 > Agree here, but "open-source friendly" companies that promote the use > of flash are much worse. As it seems to be, the reason why people want > to use flash on FreeBSD is youtube in most of cases. YouTube? Isn't the right spelling YouPorn? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47B06A39.7090708>