From owner-cvs-all  Mon Jul  3  9:13:52 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D649337B930; Mon,  3 Jul 2000 09:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA06942;
	Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@calcaphon.com>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys bus.h bus_private.h src/sys/kern subr_bus.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2000 15:42:06 BST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031532370.20885-100000@localhost> 
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 18:13:41 +0200
Message-ID: <6940.962640821@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031532370.20885-100000@localhost>, Nick Hibma wri
tes:

>Apart from that you haven't mentioned a reason why resetting the softc
>for both functions is a better idea than having a separate softc for
>the logical device. Each function surely has some private data (for
>example resources allocated to it). Why would you want to stuff that in
>some shared softc.

You are not seriously arguing for having a "newbus-softc" which contains
only a single pointer to the 'real' softc, are you ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message