From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 6 04:23:58 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CB8FE6F94 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 04:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74528472D for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 04:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w864NsgZ003887 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:23:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w864Nrpu003886; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:23:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:23:53 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Subject: Re: RPI3 swap experiments (r338342 with vm.pageout_oom_seq="1024" and 6 GB swap) Message-ID: <20180906042353.GA3482@www.zefox.net> References: <20180906003829.GC818@www.zefox.net> <201809060243.w862hq7o058504@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201809060243.w862hq7o058504@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 04:23:58 -0000 On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:43:52PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > What makes you believe that the VM system has any concept about > the speed of swap devices? IIRC it simply uses them in a round > robbin fashion with no knowlege of them being fast or slow, or > shared with files systems or other stuff. > Mostly the assertion that OOMA kills happening when the system had plenty of free swap were caused by the swap being "too slow". If the machine knows some swap is slow, it seems capable of discerning other swap is faster. Thanks for reading! bob prohaska