From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 19 1:17: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (kame196.kame.net [203.178.141.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F8B151B6; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:16:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from ebina.hitachi.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id SAA64161; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:16:27 +0900 (JST) From: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Message-Id: <200001190916.SAA64161@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:16:26 +0900 (JST) To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: itojun@iijlab.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Re: IPv6-enable ports In-Reply-To: References: <23769.947339891@coconut.itojun.org> <200001081738.CAA16033@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> X-Mailer: xcite1.31> Mew version 1.95b10 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org asami> Yes, but the difference is that, today, we know that 3-stable is IPv4 asami> only while 4-current has IPv6. You can easily distinguish them with asami> ${OSVERSION}. asami> I don't think we need USE_INET6 unless you want people to be able to asami> compile ports in -current without IPv6 support (and I already said I asami> don't see a need for that, or rather, I don't want you guys to spend asami> too much time on something like that). Okay. I will get rid of 'USE_INET6' from all ports. --- Munechika SUMIKAWA @ KAME Project / FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message