From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Fri Mar 29 08:22:51 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EB1155EA3B
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it
 [2.44.121.52])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD9E84E9A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2T8MWEM026903
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:22:40 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it
 [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu
Subject: Re: Why is Sendmail still around?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <4101a1092141b58e05ef7552278b15ff@kathe.in>
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Message-ID: <b6024975-31b1-e08b-46ee-e18597ada469@netfence.it>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:22:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4101a1092141b58e05ef7552278b15ff@kathe.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FD9E84E9A
X-Spamd-Bar: ++++
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(0.11)[ip: (0.38), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(0.19), asn: 30722(-0.05),
 country: IT(0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
 HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.52)[0.525,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.80)[0.802,0];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it];
 NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.72)[0.724,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:22:51 -0000

On 3/29/19 2:59 AM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> easier to configure for simple tasks than Sendmail.

Just out of curiosity, what do you find so hard in configuring sendmail 
*for simple tasks*?
(I agree it's somewhat confusing sometimes when it comes to complex 
edge-cases).

  bye
	av.