From owner-freebsd-fs Tue Jul 7 03:26:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA03829 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 03:26:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wipinfo.soft.net (agni.wipinfo.soft.net [164.164.6.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA03783 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 03:26:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hiren@tagore.wipinfo.soft.net) Received: from tagore.wipinfo.soft.net by wipinfo.soft.net (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA03665; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 15:51:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 16:03:29 +0530 (IST) From: Hiren Mehta X-Sender: hiren@tagore To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FC_SIZE so small Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I was looking through the code of msdosfs implementation of freebsd which uses fat-cache. I do not understand why FC_SIZE is so small (FC_SIZE=2). If we increase it to higher value, is it going to affect the performance of the file system ? Thanks Hiren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message