From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 27 16:40:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789431065694; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru) Received: from mail.inse.ru (mail.inse.ru [144.206.128.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3183F8FC1B; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik@inse.ru) Received: from www.inse.ru (www.inse.ru [144.206.128.1]) by mail.inse.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60CCF33C54; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:23:52 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <48DE5CC0.9000708@localhost.inse.ru> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:18:08 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:40:22 -0000 Have you also posted this to ports@? rik Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Good day. > > A while ago I had created the new utility that serves as VuXML > filter for the installed packages: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/126853 > > My primary intention was to speed up the process of auditing the > vulnerable ports: I needed to run portaudit checks with Nagios and to > avoid large timeouts. > > The new utility is called pkg_audit and it serves as a simple text > filter: on input it takes the full VuXML feed and on output it puts > VuXML entries that matches ports that are installed in the system with > port version specification substituted with the actual port versions. > > No harm is done to the actual poartudit -- if pkg_audit is missing, old > code path is activated. > > If someone is interested and will be able to test -- I am all ears. > > Thanks! >