From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 04:46:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F71106564A for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8678FC08 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.51]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id alMj1f00516LCl05DsmCTX; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:46:12 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id asmA1f00G1f6R9u3SsmBAg; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:46:12 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:46:08 -0800 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:46:08 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101124044608.GM48679@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CEC4677.7554.3BF9432E@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <201011231643.32338.beech@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011231643.32338.beech@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: new user questions. (Before I back myself into a corner!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:46:13 -0000 On Tue 23 Nov 2010 at 17:43:32 PST Beech Rintoul wrote: >On Tuesday 23 November 2010 13:55:51 Dave wrote: > > > >> Have a small web server, again I've read that Apache can do a good job, >> but I don't want (nor need) all it's facilities, in particular I need to >> lock it down so no "Put's" can happen for a start! The web pages are >> simple flat form, text and static graphics, with a little client side >> scripting, purely to find the client's local date and time, to select the >> graphic to serve. > >Two good choices for a lightweight webserver would be: > >www/cherokee Easy to configure > >www/lighttpd Also lightweight and easy to configure Another good one is www/hiawatha - fast, secure, easy to configure Despite popular misimpressions, there are many more webservers out there besides Apache and IIS. It will probably be well worth your time, Dave, to spend some time at freshports.org, browsing the www category.