From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 25 20: 7:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E53B14BDC for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 20:07:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2E9831C57; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:09:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6AC384D; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:09:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 22:09:07 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: "Forrest W. Christian" Cc: Marcin Cieslak , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote: > What I'd propose is one additional "track". "Branch" is the typical name for these things. I'll just offer that bitrot is a serious reason why we don't need another branch. As for 'missioncritical', we simply call it 'errata'. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message