From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 04:23:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC6416A41C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from smtp1.skyinet.net (smtp1.skyinet.net [202.78.97.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA42E43D49 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:23:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from fooler (fooler.ilo.skyinet.net [202.78.118.66]) by smtp1.skyinet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 550D8582E7; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:23:45 +0800 (PHT) Message-ID: <0fca01c581e2$8866d600$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> From: "fooler" To: "Darren Reed" , "Richard Coleman" References: <200507060356.j663ucHE011742@caligula.anu.edu.au> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:23:59 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Darren Reed , Jesper Wallin , Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:23:51 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Reed" To: "Richard Coleman" Cc: ; "Garrett Wollman" ; "Jesper Wallin" ; "Darren Reed" ; "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:56 AM Subject: Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c > In some mail from Richard Coleman, sie said: > > 1. I thought that T/TCP was being removed from FreeBSD (already happened?). > > 2. It's trivial to predict Theo's response to this. > > 3. Since T/TCP is rare, there is little motivation to alter scrub to > > function differently than OpenBSD with respect to these packets. If > > someone really needs this, there are plenty of alternatives. > > I didn't know about (1) but I'd agree with (2) and (3). even if T/TCP was remove, sending SYN + DATA + FIN is still legal... fooler.