From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 21:57:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710AB106566B for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@freebsd.org) Received: from nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 462638FC0A for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.70] by nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jul 2012 21:57:21 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.25] by tm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jul 2012 21:57:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1025.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jul 2012 21:57:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 498774.11150.bm@omp1025.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 48431 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Jul 2012 21:57:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1342735041; bh=pSYoLm5HcsBeo1kh73W7xVLxMe5Khv3QexfPHxGQoJ8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZaC9ZhLr87+7X9OYyvYYjobyNXHKOE65Wj5M4t6096Xukpvbn6Sxj4YFYkkTeqjMowcJfU0CFlHEnqrKjDdiCw4M2UDVjlwp4Eg1w8tAlK2Ob4ZI2UD9R0kTzUEPjv/LPQBOOHVIdi6dJ/6vZ6eO3oQNosGph2STEyDoJAf18bY= X-YMail-OSG: jfdfwuoVM1lsLXF9Ja71tCDb7410t7yVd.tkxuW.S6LBn9J kPgQco5oTK1ONORnaY7FdF2.L3WYkz0vL8up4.yXT_AskG_vE8DwiKA027rn buABDAuCyz3khD5.wkUxNeVnP9vlG_YfCTrUxOKYQDIgn1mS6Fr7nFxqqb3h DtLU2yh2Bx_vLbIff.tLoY0CAgCFNWFJGBiWiOBUkiHqyF51cXyxlUtMTxmJ g.Y0evyVO1e0c1ycXRum70aPaC811.1CTEuvf_xC0PzFNY.M9FZ4jc2DHBqu Cann5HD3Up43C0mifNuSFqvTGT0bwM4crPcjzOGz1PVCCO8H.clgcK5ZmGZ5 4HjL6Asxa9yh9mF3zHDzPosUjrNgjnf8.OuilFDDRi0cMCpY5lgF8UM7_ZQv vClC_q8wp3BOu7muWAw9BPDF59GxlUKzf9hFCs0LEm4tjDxuTziwqWOSW.US fns_qW0tsOXc1uoVBsJXgrU60tsYzg7Sj_zircv8iwTYSQ78SVfGCtpaALT5 1YFKibigIfle_DJYGHBbAmgK9_QNrnEYrZrKOYTO9FIOAANh0JQmzFj4E Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:57:20 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 Message-ID: <1342735040.48354.YahooMailNeo@web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:57:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Giffuni To: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: libedit : feel like obsoleting el_data_get/set X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pedro Giffuni List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:57:27 -0000 Hello;=0A=0AIn my attempt to update libedit and make it somewhat more in li= ne with=0ANetBSD's code=A0I found we added two private functions: el_data_g= et and=0Ael_data_set:=0A=0Ahttp://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&r= evision=3D50070=A0=0A=0A=0AAccording to OpenGrok we are not using those fun= ctions at all, plus=0Awe=A0have had for a while the upstream sanctioned=A0e= l_get() and=0Ael_set(),=0A.=0AI have no hurry to remove them but I do think= it would be good to=0Areduce some differences with NetBSD's version so I h= ave this=0Apatch that I would like to commit as soon as next week.=A0=0A=0A= http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/libedit/patch-libedit-obsolete=0A=0A= =0ARaise your hand if you happen to use them and would prefer=0Athe change = postponed or not done.=0A=0Abest regards,=0A=0APedro.