From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  1 18:07:43 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C3816A4D0;
	Wed,  1 Nov 2006 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from prvs=julian=453a8fdc9@elischer.org)
Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5267A43D70;
	Wed,  1 Nov 2006 18:07:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from prvs=julian=453a8fdc9@elischer.org)
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.4]) ([10.251.60.34])
	by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2006 10:07:39 -0800
Message-ID: <4548E263.80104@elischer.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:07:31 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gnn@freebsd.org
References: <200610301649.26429.davidxu@freebsd.org>	<200610302150.05499.davidxu@freebsd.org>	<m27iyhll2x.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>	<200610310718.15763.davidxu@freebsd.org>
	<m21woojq32.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
In-Reply-To: <m21woojq32.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libthr status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:07:43 -0000

gnn@freebsd.org wrote:
> At Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:18:15 +0800,
> David Xu wrote:
>> [1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (7bit)>]
>> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:23, gnn@freebsd.org wrote:
>>>> I will hack at kernel side, but who will hack userland utilities ?
>>>> e.g the /usr/bin/limits program.
>>> How hard is that to do?  If it's "easy" then I can sign up to do that.
>>>
>> I think it is not hard, but I think one at least has to hack
>> /usr/bin/limits, sh and csh which are in our base system.
> 
> I will take on the task when you have the kernel side in place.
> 
>> I will update them and make them reviewed.
>>
> 
> Great!
> 
> Thanks,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


in a manner of speaking, I wonder if that the thread limit should
be just related to the process limit..

i.e. N threads count to be 1 process..

if you use linuxthreads of rfork() then you are limited
to the process limit.. why should the other threads be different?

just a thought.