From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Feb  2 21:15:46 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA20583
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 21:15:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA20578
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 21:15:45 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id VAA43044;
	Tue, 2 Feb 1999 21:15:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 21:15:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199902030515.VAA43044@apollo.backplane.com>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Heads up: comitted optimization to vm_map_insert()
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

    I've comitted an optimization to vm_map_insert() after initial 
    tests seemed to indicate that it works.  Basically it allows
    OBJT_SWAP objects to be optimized in addition to OBJT_DEFAULT
    objects already optimized in certain specific cases.

    However, a followup test that I had never run before had a
    temporary seg-fault ( i.e. it didn't repeat when I re-ran
    the test ).  I think the seg fault may have revealed a new
    bug and is not related to the optimization I comitted, so I
    haven't backed out the commit.  I am not 100% sure though,
    and I am testing this now.

    If anyone notices weird seg-faulting that didn't occur before
    tonight, please notify me!

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message