From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 11 1:36: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15F237B422; Fri, 11 May 2001 01:35:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA09464; Fri, 11 May 2001 18:35:43 +1000 Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:34:03 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Ruslan Ermilov , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DEVFS In-Reply-To: <81000.989568380@critter> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 11 May 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Matthew > Jacob writes: > > > > > >On Thu, 10 May 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> Just installed recent -CURRENT on my PC, and noticed strange things: > >> > >> 1) If I don't have devfs line in /etc/fstab, why DEVFS mount is still > >> happening on /dev, and where? > > > >Somewhat wierdly and unobviously, it's init that does the magic. > > this is basically because it is one line to do it in /sbin/init, > but about 100 to do it in the kernel. > > Blame the poor design of mount(2) (and ask Adrian when he fixes > it :-) It must be the excellent design of mount(2) that makes it so easy to do things with it where it can be used :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message