From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 9 17:06:24 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id RAA03721 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 9 Aug 1995 17:06:24 -0700 Received: from cioeserv.cioe.com (cioeserv.cioe.com [204.120.165.59]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA03707 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 1995 17:06:21 -0700 Received: (from steve@localhost) by cioeserv.cioe.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA01516 for freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org; Wed, 9 Aug 1995 19:09:10 GMT Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 19:09:10 GMT From: Steve Ames Message-Id: <199508091909.TAA01516@cioeserv.cioe.com> To: freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: uucp dilemma? Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been running a freebsd system using uucp for a long time now (better than a year). I just put a new system under the old configuration and now its broke. *sigh*. Main differences: OLD NEW 486dx66 Pentium 90 16450 UART 16550a UART 24M of RAM 32M of RAM 'bout sums it up. Otherwise no real differences at all. What it does now is that outgoing UUCP seems to work fine. Incoming UUCP gets a lot of errrors and aborts. Let me clarify that a bit... by outgoing I mean that I dial out and deliver or pickup the packets... incoming means they call in to send or receive packets. Pretty wierd, but thats what seems to be happeing. I logged in normally and transferred some files with kermit without incident. I am thouroghly confused... (and dont' know how to spell either). -Sterve