From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 13 8:51:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8F837B401; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:51:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA02550; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:51:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:51:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200106131551.LAA02550@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fts_open() (was: Re: Patch to restore WARNS feature) In-Reply-To: <20010613182157.A12432@sunbay.com> References: <20010613153416.B21292@sunbay.com> <200106131516.LAA02178@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010613182157.A12432@sunbay.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > How should we call this function? > (I'll implement this tomorrow.) I was would call it `qsort_with_arg' or something similar. There is a namespace issue here; reserves very little namespace for the implementation, so anything we add will have to be hidden from strictly-compliant applications. If we don't want to make it a public interface, __qsort would be best (and is probably the choice of least resistance). -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message