From owner-freebsd-libh Fri Dec 20 14:16:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029E537B401 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from aeimail.aei.ca (aeimail.aei.ca [206.123.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED2243EEC for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:16:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from shall.anarcat.ath.cx (a987y72cnu4j0eln@dsl-134-52.aei.ca [66.36.134.52]) by aeimail.aei.ca (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id gBKMGQB01495; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:16:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by shall.anarcat.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A34820B; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:16:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:16:25 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Tilman Linneweh Cc: Max Okumoto , libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021220221625.GE58708@shall.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri Dec 20, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0100, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > In arved.freebsd.libh, you wrote: > > >> The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should > >> be passed to libh@freebsd.org? > > > > Who would we talk to about this? Do we want to do this? :-) > > I was just asking, since you are the only people that use the port, you probably > want to review patches to the port. Yep. Thinking again about this, I'd really like to have maintainership of the port, since recent changes (the 0.8 upgrade, in particular) totally broke tvision and no one but us noticed. :) > > The original code is copyrighted by Borland but is freely available from > > the net. Try here. This port is distributed under the GPL license and > > the Sigala's port under a BSD like license. [stuff deleted] > > > > Which is why I am asking. > > Sorry, didn't know that. I'll hide under my stone again. > But i would prefer using tvision because of the license. I think there's been some confusion here. The text max quoted is from http://tvision.sf.net/. But this is the rhtvision port. The tvision port is exactly that, the Sigala's port. So if we can revert back to tvision as I wish, everything will be well. In the meantime, rhtivision is a workable replacement, however bad it is. But it is clear in my mind that we cannot package libh linking against rhtvision without modifications to rhtvision, since it links uselessly against X11. I just ported libh to rhtvision in order to unbreak it completely under -current. A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message