From owner-freebsd-net Tue Nov 16 12:43:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.interlog.com (smtp.interlog.com [207.34.202.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F1D14EFE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 12:43:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from al.feldman@sangoma.com) Received: from alex (dm.interlog.com [199.212.154.24]) by smtp.interlog.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA17951 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:43:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <004001bf3074$33255f10$7801a8c0@alex.SANGOMA.COM> From: "Alex Feldman" To: Subject: Network interface name Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:50:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm writting multiple device/protocol driver. My netowork interface name includes number in the middle of the name (ex. xx1_xxx12). when I check is network interface is already attached to kernel, I use 'ifunit' function. But, as I see its source code, FreeBSD not permit the number inside the network interface name. Is someone went into this problem? How can I solve this problem (without changing the name)? I think that enoght to change only 'ifunit' function.. Is it correct? Thank you for any help.. Regards, Alex Feldman E-mail : al.feldman@sangoma.com Sangoma Technologies Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message